Everyone can do it experiment will not catch much serious attention. Dishing up the same old stuff of few hounded years might seemed child's play to some. However, many fundamentals of the universe are revealed if looked closer. Significant facts can be misinterpreted, overlooked, or ignored when we rush forward. The truth is, free fall experiments reveal more than just gravity.

Gravity is not attraction; falling is an action, and space is infinitely independent.

Information can be in many forms. Radiation, light, particle, air, sound, radio, or print, just to name a few. In any form, it has to obey the fundamental principles of mass, energy, and motion. At any single frame of moment, there is only one physical location for any object and it's action to unfold. It is the progression of the universe we perceived it as arrow of time. Real event does not replay, however, it's radiations can be delivered as information to observers a...

We live in a totally immersed reality. Information can be augmented by environment as well as personal feeling. It is illusion if we can not distinguish reality and it's information.

We hear the word radiation often. We see waves revealed by water, and air wave above hot surface. We feel the air (wind) and hear it's motion (sound), even see the supersonic shack wave of air. How particle, wave, radiant energy, or EMR is different from perceivable world in our day to day life? Shouldn't there be fundamental principles that governing the action of matter and it's interaction with it's environment?

Oscillating piano string with hummer, it makes sound and heat. Dust or water droplets on th string will be shook off. Oscillating it with electricity, it produces heat and light. Particles are radiated when oscillated in high energy. Certainly, the structure of the string will not survive long in such intense. Comparing to what the Sun is doing, do you see the similarity? Isn't the Sun is oscillating at the intense of destruction?

I got into this is because I can't shake off those mind boggling interpretations from my head.

Just can't shake off those mind boggling interpretations from my head.

Wave is a fundamental action of the universe. Water waves when it is disturbed by internal or external force. And, there be higher water level when waves meet the shore. This study examines the driving forces of waving gas, liquid, and solid anew when gravity is not force of attraction.

Gravity is not a force of attraction. It has raised the question of how the Sun and Moon affect the tide when attraction force has nothing to do with it.

The vitality of gravity can't be overstated. Interacting with other forces, i.e. solar, centrifugal, geothermal, and magnetic, it creates circulations of particle, gas, liquid, and solid. Gravity is clear, free, and perpetual energy, however, misunderstood for centuries. Understanding and mimicking this natural potential can significantly benefit all lives on Earth.

Mimicking nature's circulations of resources will benefit all lives greatly. I believe managing water cycle is easier than we think. It's the very first step of our civilization. We can not continue to deny our mistakes and misdirected objectives. The question is, are we doing all right things out of the true respect and love for all lives, our children and their future in particular?

A simple way of approximating π

Easy π approximation

Big-bang and universe expansion are illusions of cosmic redshift. Space has no surface, boundary, and friction. Even if space could expand, it will no carry anything along. The size of the universe is defined by it's boundary, not the separation of objects. Unless the boundary of the universe can be measured, it's size can not be defined. Neither, can we linearly revert the universe had started from a very high density and high temperature state based on the receding obj...

The dominating and exponential natures of radiation redshift do not suggest acceleratingly physical departure of all astronomical objects, neither inflation nor a common origin. Universe will continue as is, no extra matter and energy needed. Otherwise, besides the demand for run-away energy/matter; the interactions among ordinary energy/matter and run-away energy/matter; and acceleratingly expansion demands accelerating energy/matter; and on. It can only lead to run-awa...

Many incomprehensible paradoxes are created by dark matter and dark energy. Physical matter, dark or not, has to occupy space and prevent other matter from taking the same location. On the other hand, isn't it meaningless if dark matter and dark energy can occupy the same space of ordinary matter and energy without interactions?

If redshift was not over (even mis) interpreted, all further controversial interpretations can be avoided. Time and effort of scientists is too valuable isn't it?

Atomic electron transition appears leaping from one energy level to another. The issue is, atomic particles are too small and too fast for our detectors to recognize their action and identity. I believe it is due to the sensors can only detect and register the repeated trajectory. Particle would have to revolving on the same orbit long enough. Otherwise, it would not trigger the reaction of the detectors. Transitional trajectory is short, and it does not repeat. It can ...

Inertia of particle would resist any sudden jump. Quantum jump is likely be the blind-spot of the observer. Electron would have to revolving on the same orbit long enough. Otherwise, it would not trigger the reaction of the detectors. We are unable to see it's transition trajectory. Hence, jump.

Space is in our hands and all around us. We have learned to manipulate matter and energy since our first existence on Earth, but never space. It is the absolute complement of the physical universe. It is impossible to bend space since it has no boundary and surface. Space can not have boundary. Otherwise, it would separate space from something else outside of the space. Neither the boundary or surface of the space nor the outside of the space can be defined as anythin...

Space is fundamental, it is independent from mass, energy, and everything else. It is the absolute complement of the physical universe. It can not be disturbed, otherwise there would be no peace in whole universe. And, space and time can not go together. Space has existence, time has not. Space is absolutely recyclable, never time. Haven't we confused by looking too hard?

To me, a star is analogous to a constant and all directional nuclear exploding jet engine. Expelling particles would create it's opposite imploding force. By squeezing mass and energy into single point, I don't see other action can create stronger concentrative mass and force than implosive compression. Under this constant compression, a star can reach it's limit of structure and go supernova. The surface activities would radiate the frequency beyond our detection, a bla...

Even invisible, a black hole is a super star. It's hyper intensity of surface activities is beyond our detection. A massive black hole can create its' own super space cyclone. Other subsystems can be caught by the storm and form a galaxy, a superset collection of solar and planetary systems by nature's inheritance and self-similarity.

To me. the gravity of super-sized planet can trigger global nuclear reactions and become a star. The expelled particles embrace objects in it's path and create a space cyclone, solar system. Our Solar System is a cyclone powered by the vortex force of a single dominating star, the Sun, in weightless space. The Sun regulates the orbits and reduces the collision of all plants and alike within it's reach. The question is, would it be our second star if Jupiter got a chanc...

Isn't the Solar System resemblance of a cyclone powered by the vortex force of the Sun in weightless space?

To me, a star is analogous to a constant and all directional nuclear exploding jet engine. Expelling particles would create it's opposite imploding force. By squeezing mass and energy into single point, I don't see other action can create stronger concentrative mass and force than implosive compression. Under this constant compression, a star can reach it's limit of structure and go supernova. The surface activities would radiate the frequency beyond our detection, a bla...

We see the similarity in galaxy, solar system, hurricanes, down to smallest vortex. We also see the self-similarity of life. I believe a black hole, even invisible, is a super star creates it's own super space storm. It's hyper intensity of activities on the surface is beyond our detection.

To me. the gravity of super-sized planet can trigger global nuclear reactions and become a star. The expelled particles embrace objects in it's path and create a space cyclone, solar system. Our Solar System is a cyclone powered by the vortex force of a single dominating star, the Sun, in weightless space. The Sun regulates the orbits and reduces the collision of all plants and alike within it's reach. The question is, would it be our second star if Jupiter got a chanc...

Isn't the Solar System resemblance of a cyclone powered by the vortex force of the Sun in weightless space?

Our perception is the information of the physical events collected by our sensors. Observation is a special case of transportation of stream of packages of information. The order and interval of the arrival of signals would determine the perception of the observer. One important issue to consider is, not all packages are received by the observer. We can catch more packages with high-speed recorder, however, many mores are lost, not to mention there are packages of signa...

The issue is, sometime we can not separate the event and it's information, and even fooled by it.

The infinite dynamic of the universe is maintained by the fundamental principle; infinite, independent, identity, perfect recycle, coherent, complement, and interaction principle.

Infinite, independent, identity, perfect recycle, coherent, complement, and interaction principle of fundamentals.

Despite our progress, predicting the hazardous activities of lithosphere has been a long endeavor. The issue is, Earth's gravity is the inward force of keeping all thing tight to maintain it's spherical shape. Force of tectonic motion has to fight against the persisting gravity to push the crust from ocean floor to the top of mountain ranges. However, gravity can not be a pulling force, or tidal drag, of seismic activities. It is no attraction force has been shown by fa...

I don't believe the mantle convection can be the driving force. Instead, it is driven by gravity and centrifugal forces. Hot mantle can not raise without the gravity or centrifugal force to provide ascending buoyancy. And, cool mantle will not sink without the gravity. It is the same principle of hot air does not raise and cold air does not sink in zero gravity. Gravity force makes denser elements sink and lighter ones raise. On the other hand, centrifugal force works i...

A little book to his father by a third grader on Father's Day, 2007.

If I were a car, toolbox, flashlight, computer, monkey, solar panel, goat, or tow truck.

A little book to her father by a third grader on Father's Day, 2004.

If I were a firefly, bee, hummingbird, puppy, wolf, kitten, hammer, or pencil.