Solaris, Directed by Andrei Tarkovsky - Psychological and Philosophical Aspects

By Sfetcu, Nicolae

Book Id: WPLBN0100302024
Format Type: PDF eBook:
File Size: 0.1 MB
Reproduction Date: 5/7/2019

Title:	Solaris, Directed by Andrei Tarkovsky - Psychological and Philosophical Aspects
Author:	Sfetcu, Nicolae
Volume:
Language:	English
Subject:	Non Fiction, Philosophy, solaris
Collections:	Authors Community, Philosophy
Historic Publication Date:	2019
Publisher:	Multimedia SRL

Member Page:	Nicolae Sfetcu
Citation APA MLA Chicago Sfetcu, B. N. (2019). Solaris, Directed by Andrei Tarkovsky - Psychological and Philosophical Aspects. Retrieved from http://gutenberg.cc/

Description
About the main psychological and philosophical aspects detached from the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovski, as well as the cinema techniques used by the director to convey his messages to the spectator. In the "Introduction" I briefly present the relevant elements of Tarkovski's biography and an overview of Stanislav Lem's Solaris novel and the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovsky. In "Cinema Technique" I talk about the specific rhythm of the scenes, the radical movement triggered by Tarkovsky in modern cinema, the role of symbolic and iconic elements, and affinities with the fantastic area of Russian literature. In Psychological Aspects I analyze the issue of communication in a human society of the future considered by Tarkovsky as rigid, the obsession of the house, and the personal evolution of Kris, Hari, and the relationships between them. In Philosophical Aspects, the film is analyzed through the philosophy of the mind (Cartesian dualism, reductionism and functionalism), the problem of personal identity, the theory of heterotopic spaces developed by Michel Foucault, and the semantic interpretations that can be deduced from the film. It also analyzes the issue of personal identity through Locke's philosophy. "Conclusions" show the general ideas of this essay, namely that Man's attempts to classify and maintain forms of interaction with unknown entities will always be condemned to failure and will reflect a major mistake in the panoptic world in which we live. In this framework of analysis of the philosophy of mind, functionalism seems to be the most intuitive. Solaris is, however, a movie that begins as a search for answers and comes to provide these answers with a whole range of different questions. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28635.82723

Summary
About the main psychological and philosophical aspects detached from the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovski, as well as the cinema techniques used by the director to convey his messages to the spectator. In the "Introduction" I briefly present the relevant elements of Tarkovski's biography and an overview of Stanislav Lem's Solaris novel and the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovsky. In "Cinema Technique" I talk about the specific rhythm of the scenes, the radical movement triggered by Tarkovsky in modern cinema, the role of symbolic and iconic elements, and affinities with the fantastic area of Russian literature. In Psychological Aspects I analyze the issue of communication in a human society of the future considered by Tarkovsky as rigid, the obsession of the house, and the personal evolution of Kris, Hari, and the relationships between them. In Philosophical Aspects, the film is analyzed through the philosophy of the mind (Cartesian dualism, reductionism and functionalism), the problem of personal identity, the theory of heterotopic spaces developed by Michel Foucault, and the semantic interpretations that can be deduced from the film. It also analyzes the issue of personal identity through Locke's philosophy. "Conclusions" show the general ideas of this essay, namely that Man's attempts to classify and maintain forms of interaction with unknown entities will always be condemned to failure and will reflect a major mistake in the panoptic world in which we live. In this framework of analysis of the philosophy of mind, functionalism seems to be the most intuitive. Solaris is, however, a movie that begins as a search for answers and comes to provide these answers with a whole range of different questions. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28635.82723

Excerpt
About the main psychological and philosophical aspects detached from the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovski, as well as the cinema techniques used by the director to convey his messages to the spectator. In my exposition, I rely on the works of Andrei Tarkovsky (Sculpting in Time: Reflections on the Cinema), (Andrey Tarkovsky 1996) R. M. P. (The Science-Fiction Films of Andrei Tarkovsky), (Salvestroni 1987) Thomas P. Weissert (Stanislaw Lem and a Topology of Mind), (Weissert 1992) Vladimir Tumanov (Philosophy of Mind and Body in Andrei Tarkovsky’s Solaris), (Tumanov 2016) David George Menard (A Deleuzian Analysis of Tarkovsky’s Theory of Time-Pressure), (Menard 2003) Elyce Rae Helford (“We are only seeking Man”: Gender, Psychoanalysis, and Stanislaw Lem’s Solaris), (Helford 1992) Manfred Geier (Stanislaw Lem’s Fantastic Ocean: Toward a Semantic Interpretation of Solaris), (Geier 1992) Daniel McFadden (Memory and Being: The Uncanny in the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky) (McFadden 2012) and Richard Duffy (Sculpted in time: Heterotopic space in Andrei Tarkovsky’s Solaris). (Duffy 2003) In the "Introduction" I briefly present the relevant elements of Tarkovski's biography and an overview of Stanislav Lem's Solaris novel and the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovsky. In "Cinema Technique" I talk about the specific rhythm of the scenes, the radical movement triggered by Tarkovsky in modern cinema, the role of symbolic and iconic elements, and affinities with the fantastic area of Russian literature. In Psychological Aspects I analyze the issue of communication in a human society of the future considered by Tarkovsky as rigid, the obsession of the house, and the personal evolution of Kris, Hari, and the relationships between them. In Philosophical Aspects, the film is analyzed through the philosophy of the mind (Cartesian dualism, reductionism and functionalism), the problem of personal identity, the theory of heterotopic spaces developed by Michel Foucault, and the semantic interpretations that can be deduced from the film. It also analyzes the issue of personal identity through Locke's philosophy. "Conclusions" show the general ideas of this essay, namely that Man's attempts to classify and maintain forms of interaction with unknown entities will always be condemned to failure and will reflect a major mistake in the panoptic world in which we live. In this framework of analysis of the philosophy of mind, functionalism seems to be the most intuitive. Solaris is, however, a movie that begins as a search for answers and comes to provide these answers with a whole range of different questions.

Table of Contents
Abstract Introduction 1 Cinema technique 2 Psychological Aspects 3 Philosophical aspects Conclusions Bibliography Notes