Mobile Talent or Privileged Sites? Making Sense of Biotech Knowledge Worker Mobility and Performance in Sweden : Volume 2, Issue 2 (20/12/2007)

By Mattsson, H.

Book Id: WPLBN0004022109
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 9
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title:	Mobile Talent or Privileged Sites? Making Sense of Biotech Knowledge Worker Mobility and Performance in Sweden : Volume 2, Issue 2 (20/12/2007)
Author:	Mattsson, H.
Volume:	Vol. 2, Issue 2
Language:	English
Subject:	Science, Social, Geography
Collections:	Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection, Copernicus GmbH
Historic Publication Date:	2007
Publisher:	Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany

Member Page:	Copernicus Publications
Citation APA MLA Chicago Mattsson, H. (2007). Mobile Talent or Privileged Sites? Making Sense of Biotech Knowledge Worker Mobility and Performance in Sweden : Volume 2, Issue 2 (20/12/2007). Retrieved from http://gutenberg.cc/

Description
Description: Dept. of Social & Economic Geography and CIND, Uppsala Universitet, Sweden. Great hope is currently put in biotechnological innovation to create economic growth and ensure future competitiveness of regions and nations. For some years, economic geography and economics have been focusing on privileged sites when explaining geographical variances in actors' ability to innovate: e.g. regional innovation systems, clusters, industrial districts and creative milieus. In such explanations, the basic notion is that certain sites, as a result of their privileged configuration, relative position and history, tend to support innovation to a higher degree than other milieus. Lately, however, there has been a shift in focus within some research communities towards what could be called a talented people explanation. The problem for those interested in biotech innovation policy and in the larger question about exactly how biotechnological knowledge production takes place, is that this debate offers two diametrically different understandings of (i) the geography of innovation and, in turn, (ii) how to actually design innovative spaces or increase rates of innovation. According to the talented people argument, innovation policy should be focusing on designing attractive spaces in which creative people want to live, while the privileged sites argument instead focuses on figuring out how to design creative spaces. In this paper, a unique dataset is used to explore to what extent the two debating concepts, privileged sites and talented people, can explain what is going on in biotech landscapes in Sweden.

Summary
Mobile talent or privileged sites? Making sense of biotech knowledge worker mobility and performance in Sweden

Excerpt
Hallin, G. and Östhol, A.: On the growth policy agenda, Stockholm: ITPS, 2004.; Almeida, P., and Kogut, B.: Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks, Manage. Sci., 45(7), 905–917, 1999.; Asheim, B.: Industrial districts as learning regions: a condition for prosperity, European Planning Studies, 4, 379–400, 1996.; Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., and Heidenreich, M. (Eds.): Regional Innovation Systems, London: UCL Press, 1998.; Cooke, P.: Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters, J. Technol. Transfer, 27(1), 133–145, 2002.; Edquist, C.: Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations, Science, technology and the international political economy, London: Pinter, 1997.; Florida, R.: The economic geography of talent, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 92(4), 743–755, 2002a.; Florida, R.: The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, New York: Basic Books, 2002b.; Lundvall, B.-Å.: National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, London: Pinter, 1992.; Lundvall, B.-Å.: National Innovation Systems: analytical concept and development tool, in: DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference, Copenhagen Business School, 2005.; Malmberg, A.: Klusterdynamik och regional näringslivsutveckling – begreppsdiskussion och forskningsöversikt, ITPS rapportserie A2002:008, Stockholm: ITPS, 2002.; Malmberg, A, and P Maskell. 1997. Towards an explanation of regional specialisation and industry agglomeration. European Planning Studies 5:1-15.; Marshall, A: Industrial Organization, Continued. The Concentration of Specialized Industries in particular Localities. In Principles of Economics, Book IV, Chapter X, edited by: Marshall, A., London: Macmillan, 1920/1960.; Maskell, P., and Malmberg, A.: Localised learning and industrial competitiveness, Cambridge J. Econ., 23, 167–185, 1999.; Mattsson, H.: How Does Knowledge Production Take Place? On Locating and Mapping Science and Similar Unruly Activities, in: Taking Place, Locating Science, Technology, and Business Studies, edited by: Baraldi, E., Fors, H., and Houltz, A., Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications, 2006.; Porter, M.: Clusters and the new economics of competition, Harvard Business Review Nov–Dec, 77–90, 1998. %; %Power, D., and Lundmark, M.: Labour Market Dynamics and the %Development of the ICT Cluster in the Stockholm Region, in: Handbook of %Research on Clusters, edited by: Karlsson, C., Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, %US: Edward Elgar, in preparation\blackbox\bf status?, 2007.; Rinaldi, A.: More than the sum of their parts?, EMBO reports, 7(2), 133–136, 2006.; Scott, A. J.: Metropolis: From the Division of Labor to Urban Form, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988.; Storper, M. and Venables, A.: Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy, J. Econ. Geogr., 4, 351–370, 2004.; Storper, M.: The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade, Los Angeles: University of California, 1992.; Waxell, A.: The Uppsala Biotech Cluster. Economic-Geographical Studies of Interaction, Knowledge Spill-over and Labour Mobility, Geografiska regionstudier 62, Uppsala: Uppsala University, 2005.; Waxell, A. and Malmberg, A.: What is global and what is local in knowledge-creating interaction? The case of the biotech cluster in Uppsala, Sweden, Entrep. Region. Dev., 19, 137–159, 2007.